ORDER

1) Heard Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Chutke, learned APP for the respondent/State.

2) The order dated 09.02.2022 reads as under:

"2. Heard Mr. Deshpande, learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits, that the case against the petitioner does not attract Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2015 (hereinafter to be referred as the "J.J. Act, 2015"). The brief facts relating to the matter are that the petitioner is the Head Master of Suyash Convent School, Nagpur, in which one Manaish Haribhau Raut was appointed as a dance teacher. On 30.11.2016, when the said Manaish Haribhau Raut was teaching dance to the students in the school and while the practice was going on, he has assaulted his students with an iron rod causing injuries to them, as a result of which, a complaint was lodged by one Aruna Rajendra Khandale, the mother of one of the girls vide crime No. 519/2016 for the offence punishable under Section 324 of the Indian Penal code which came to be registered against the said Manish Haribhau Raut. However, the charge-sheet which came to be filed on 18.04.2017, surprisingly included the name of the petitioner as