Nitesh Singh vs Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1155

A.A.SAYED, ABHAY AHUJA
Nitesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vivek Shukla a/w Mr. Narbert D`Souza, Mr. Arman Prave, Mr. Yash Mishra i/b M/s V. Shukla, for the Appellant; Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. K.H. Mastakar, Mr. S. B. Shetye, Mr. A. L. Patki, Addl. GP, for the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

A.A. Sayed, J. - Arguments in the above PIL Petition were heard on 15 February 2022. It is placed for orders today.

2. The PIL Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking the following relief:

(a) That this Hon'ble Court exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 be pleased to issue writ mandamus, and or any other appropriate writ, order, quashing and setting aside Notification No. SEC/MMC-2021/ Pr.Kr.22/Ka-5 dated 27.01.2022 as published in the Official Gazette on 01.02.2022 (Exhibit A) by holding the same as illegal, null, void, preposterous, bad-in-law.

3. The Petitioner No. 1 is a businessman and a member of Bhartiya Janta Party. The Petitioner No. 2 is a practicing Advocate and a member of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena. It is the case of the Petitioners that they learnt about the draft Notification dated 27.01.2022 after reading the advertisement published by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as "Corporation") in the daily newspaper on 01.02.2022. By this advertisement the Municipal Commissioner of the Corporation i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1155

A.A.SAYED, ABHAY AHUJANitesh Singh – AppellantVersusMunicipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai – Respondent

Cases Referred (1)

A.A.SAYED, ABHAY AHUJA
Nitesh Singh – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai – Respondent