SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1155

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
A. A. Sayed, Abhay Ahuja, JJ.
Nitesh Singh - Appellant
Versus
The Municipal Corporation Of Gr. Mumbai & Ors. - Respondents
Public Interest Litigation (L) No. 3961 of 2022
Decided On : 21-02-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Vivek Shukla a/w Mr. Narbert D`Souza, Mr. Arman Prave, Mr. Yash Mishra i/b M/s V. Shukla, for the Appellant; Mr. A.Y. Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w Ms. K.H. Mastakar, Mr. S. B. Shetye, Mr. A. L. Patki, Addl. GP, for the Respondent.

The court emphasized the importance of mandatory averments and disclosures in Public Interest Litigation and found the PIL Petition to be politically motivated.

Headnote:

PIL Petition - Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Section 5 and 18A of the MMC Act - [Article 243U, Article 243ZA, Section 5, Section 18A] - The court discussed the delegation of powers by the State Election Commissioner, the bar on alteration of boundaries, and the validity of the draft Notification. The court found the PIL Petition to be politically motivated and dismissed it with costs.

Fact of the Case:

The PIL Petition sought to quash a draft Notification under sections 5 and 18A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The Petitioners alleged that the Municipal Commissioner was not independent and that the alteration of boundaries was impermissible due to the upcoming Corporation Election.

Finding of the Court:

The court found the PIL Petition to be politically motivated and lacking mandatory averments and disclosures. It dismissed the petition with costs quantified at Rs. 50,000/- to be paid by the Petitioners to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority.

Issues: The issues included the delegation of powers by the State Election Commissioner, the bar on alteration of boundaries, and the validity of the draft Notification.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the delegation of powers to the Municipal Commissioner was valid, the bar on alteration of boundaries did not apply to Ward boundaries, and the PIL Petition lacked mandatory averments and disclosures.

Final Decision: The PIL Petition was dismissed with costs quantified at Rs. 50,000/- to be paid by the Petitioners to the Maharashtra State Legal Services Authority.

JUDGMENT

A.A. Sayed, J. - Arguments in the above PIL Petition were heard on 15 February 2022. It is placed for orders today.

2. The PIL Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking the following relief:

    (a) That this Hon'ble Court exercising power under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950 be pleased to issue writ mandamus, and or any other appropriate writ, order, quashing and setting aside Notification No. SEC/MMC-2021/ Pr.Kr.22/Ka-5 dated 27.01.2022 as published in the Official Gazette on 01.02.2022 (Exhibit A) by holding the same as illegal, null, void, preposterous, bad-in-law.

    3. The Petitioner No. 1 is a businessman and a member of Bhartiya Janta Party. The Petitioner No. 2 is a practicing Advocate and a member of Maharashtra Navnirman Sena. It is the case of the Petitioners that they learnt about the draft Notification dated 27.01.2022 after reading the advertisement published by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (hereinafter referred to as "Corporation") in the daily newspaper on 01.02.2022. By this advertisement the Municipal Commissioner of the Corporation invited objections or suggestions on or before 14.02.2022 on the draft Notification under sections 5 and 18A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888 (hereinafter referred to as "the MMC Act") to fix the number and the extent of the wards into which the municipal area of the Corporation shall be divided as shown in the Schedule thereto.

    4. The Advertisement published containing the draft Notification reads as follows:

      "BRIHANMUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NOTIFICATION

      No. ?????/ ???? 2021/ ???.???. 22/ ?? -5 dated 27th January 2022.- The State Election Commissioner, Maharashtra proposes to make the following Draft Notification under section 5 and Section 18A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. (Bom. III of 1889) (hereinafter referred to as the "said Act") to fix for the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, the number and the extent of the wards into which the said municipal area shall be divided, as shown in the Schedule to this Draft order.2. And whereas the said Draft Order is hereby published as required by the section 19 (1) (a) of the said Act for information of all the residents within the jurisdiction of the Brihan mumbai Municipal Corporation. And Whereas, vide order No.SEC/MNC-2014/CR-26/D-5, dated 06.02.2015 the State Election Commission, Maharashtra, has conferred its rights to Municipal Commissioner, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation to publish the draft in the Official Gazette. Accordingly this Draft Notification is being published and the said draft will be taken into consideration by the State Election Commissioner, Maharashtra or the officer authorized by him for this purpose after dated 1st February 2022.

      3. And whereas, all persons who desire to raise any objections or suggestions to this draft should submit the same to the Municipal Commissioner, Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, in writing with reasons on or before dated 14th February 2022. Objections or suggestions received thereafter will not be considered.

      Draft Notification

      WHEREAS, The State Election Commissioner, Maharashtra has specified for Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation, under Section 5 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporations Act, the number of Councilors to be elected is 236.

      2. Now, therefore, in exercise of section 5 and Section 18A of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, The State Election Commissioner, Maharashtra State hereby fix the number and extent of the wards into which the said Municipal Corporation area shall be divided as shown in the schedule to this Notification.

      3. This Notification shall take effect for the purpose of the next general election held immediately following the date of this Notification.

      SCHEDULE

      Ward No. & Population

      Name of the ward, if any

      Extent of the Ward

      (1)

      (2)

      (3)

      Ward No. -1 Population Total - 53479 SC-1106 ST - 3

          Click Here to Read the rest of this document
          1
          2
          3
          4
          5
          6
          7
          8
          9
          10
          11
          SupremeToday Portrait Ad
          supreme today icon
          logo-black

          An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

          Please visit our Training & Support
          Center or Contact Us for assistance

          qr

          Scan Me!

          India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

          For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

          whatsapp-icon Back to top