JUDGMENT

a.S. Chandurkar, J. - RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2. The challenge raised in this writ petition is to the order dated 20.11.2018 passed by the Central administrative Tribunal, Nagpur in Original application No.211 of 2018. By that order, the claim of the petitioner for grant of family pension has been rejected.

3. It is not necessary to refer to the facts in detail since we find that before the Tribunal the respondents had filed their reply to the Original application on 24.10.2018. The record indicates that on the same day the proceedings were closed for passing the judgment and the impugned order was delivered on 20.11.2018. Perusal of the reply filed by the respondents before the Tribunal and especially paragraph 10 thereof indicates that the aspects stated therein have been considered by the Tribunal while denying the claim of the petitioner for grant of family pension. To counter the documents filed alongwith the said reply, the petitioner seeks to rely upon fresh documents that are placed before this Court alongwith the writ petition. In this context, in Ground No.(I) of the writ petition it has been specifically s