SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1504

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH
V. M. Deshpande, Amit B. Borkar, JJ.
Pankaj & Ors. - Appellants
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Criminal Application [Appeal] No. 1376 of 2021
Decided On : 28-03-2022

Advocates appeared:
Saurabh Raut, Advocate, S. M. Ghodeswa, Advocate

The court can quash a criminal case if it finds that the alleged offense is unnecessarily incorporated in the FIR and the ingredients of the offense are not satisfied, especially when the parties have arrived at an amicable resolution.

Headnote:

Section 482 - Quashing of FIR - Amicable Resolution of Dispute

Fact of the Case:

The applicants challenged the registration of a first information report (FIR) filed against them for offenses under the Indian Penal Code. During the proceedings, the applicants and the complainant arrived at a mutual settlement and decided to take divorce by mutual consent.

Finding of the Court:

The court, after reviewing the allegations in the FIR and the material produced in the charge-sheet, found that the ingredients of the alleged offenses were not satisfied, even if the allegations were accepted at face value. Citing the judgment of the Hon'ble apex Court in Narinder Singh's case, the court held that there was no impediment for quashing the FIR and the consequent charge-sheet and criminal proceedings against the applicants.

Issues: Challenge to the registration of FIR, amicable resolution of dispute, quashing of criminal proceedings

Ratio Decidendi: The court can quash a criminal case if it is of the opinion that the offense alleged in the FIR is unnecessarily incorporated and the ingredients of the offense are not satisfied, especially in cases where the parties have arrived at an amicable resolution.

Final Decision: The criminal application was allowed, and the court quashed the FIR, charge-sheet, and all consequential proceedings against the applicants.

JUDGMENT

amit B. Borkar, J. - Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the parties.

2. By this joint application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the applicant nos.1 to 7 are challenging registration of the first information report vide Crime No. 14/2020, dated 17.01.2020 filed against them by applicant no.8 with non-applicant Police Station, Wathoda, Nagpur for the offence punishable under Sections 498-a, 294, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and consequent charge-sheet bearing No. 53/2020 dated 24.09.2020 and criminal case bearing Regular Criminal Case No. 2067/2020 pending before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur.

3. The first information report in question came to be registered against the applicant nos.1 to 7 with accusation that they have physically and mentally harassed applicant no.8 for non-payment of dowry. The investigating agency after completion of the investigation filed the charge-sheet against applicant nos.1 to 7.

4. We have heard Shri Saurabh Raut, learned counsel for the applicants and Shri S.M. Ghodeswar, learned additional Public Prosecutor the non-applicant/State.

5. During pendency of the proceedings before the trial Court, the applicant nos.1 to 7 and applicant no.8 have arrived at a mutual settlement. The applicants have filed a pursis annexing a copy of the affidavits of applicant no.1/husband and applicant no.8/ wife.

6. Today, the applicant no.1/husband and applicant no.8/wife are personally present before the Court. They state that they have resolved their dispute amicably and they have decided to take divorce by mutual consent and accordingly, a petition under Section 13-B of the Hindu Marriage act has already been filed. applicant no.8/wife has stated that she has amicably resolved the dispute and there is no objection for quashing proceedings against the applicants. She states that the consent given by her is voluntary.

7. We have gone through the allegations in the first information report and the material produced in the form of charge-sheet. On going through the same, we are satisfied that the ingredients of the offence alleged against the applicants are not satisfied even if the allegations are accepted and the material produced in the charge-sheet is taken on its face value.

8. The Hon'ble apex Court in Narinder Singh .vs. State of Punjab, reported in 2014 aIR SCW 2065 has observed that the Court cannot decline to quash criminal case in which the first information report incorporates a particular provision, which is a serious offence or an offence against the society. The Court shall make all endeavor whether the first information report indeed discloses the ingredient of such offence and Court can accept the settlement and quash the first information report, if the Court is of the opinion that such offence is unnecessarily incorporated in the first information report.

9. In view of amicable resolution of the dispute between the applicant nos.1 to 7 and applicant no.8 and in view of the judgment of Hon'ble apex Court in Narinder Singh's case (supra) , there is no impediment for quashing of the first information report and the consequent charge-sheet and criminal proceedings against the applicants. We, therefore, pass the following order :

ORDER

1. The Criminal application is allowed.

2. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a), which reads as under :-

    'Quash and set aside FIR/Crime No. 14/2020, dated 17th January, 2020 registered by non-applicant - Police Station, Wathoda, Nagpur against applicant nos.1 to 7 alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 498-a, 294, 323 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and all the consequential proceedings arising there from including the Final Report / Charge-sheet No. 53/2020 dated 24th September, 2020 submitted before the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur, Dist. Nagpur by the non-applicant Police Station, Wathoda, Dist. Nagpur, alleging commission of the abovem

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top