IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY AURANGABAD BENCH
R. D. Dhanuka, S. G. Mehare, JJ.
Souvenir Developers (i) Private Limited - Appellant
Versus
The Union Of India - Respondent
Income Tax Appeal No. 79 of 2018
Decided On : 06-05-2022
Income Tax - Derivatives - Section 43(5)(d), Section 70 - The court considered the applicability of Section 43(5)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to the set-off of losses from derivative transactions against income from infrastructure business. The court held that transactions in derivatives on recognized stock exchanges are not speculative transactions and are eligible for set-off against business income under Section 70.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant, a domestic company, incurred losses from transactions in derivatives on recognized stock exchanges and sought to set off these losses against income from infrastructure business. The assessing officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) refused to consider the losses while computing the net income of the appellant.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the losses from derivative transactions were not speculative and were eligible for set-off against income from the infrastructure business under Section 70 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Issues: The main issue was whether the losses from derivative transactions could be set off against income from the infrastructure business under Section 70, considering the provisions of Section 43(5)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that transactions in derivatives on recognized stock exchanges are not speculative transactions and are eligible for set-off against business income under Section 70.
Final Decision: The court allowed the appeal, answering the substantial questions of law in favor of the assessee.
JUDGMENT
R. D. Dhanuka, J. - The appeal by the assessee under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 raises the following substantial questions of law :-
(i) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal was justified in confirming any addition on transaction in derivatives on recognized stock exchange as defined under Section 43 (5) (d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 with reference to explanation given to Section 73 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 which is applicable to speculative transactions.
(ii) Whether loss suffered by the appellant on the transactions in respect of trading in derivatives referred to in clause (ac) of Section 2 of the Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act, 1956 carried out in a recognized stock exchange by the appellant could have been set off against the income of the appellant arisen out of infrastructure business carried on by the appellant under Section 70 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. By consent of parties appeal is heard finally. Some of the relevant facts for the purpose of deciding this appeal are as under :-
The relevant assessment year is 2009-10 and financial year is 2008-09. The appellant is a domestic company and derives income from business.
The appellant is dealing in collection of Toll fees in the name and style 'M/s. Souvenir Developer (India), Pvt. Ltd., Dhule'. The appellant is also carrying business of shares and derivatives. The return of income declaring total income of Rs.85,43,220/- was submitted electronically by assessee on 30th September 2009. The same was processed on 28th March 2011 under section 143 (1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 by accepting the return of income. Subsequently the case of the appellant was picked up for scrutiny. The statutory notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 was issued on 28th September 2010. The appellant was granted an opportunity of being heard by the assessing officer. The appellant produced the information called as per questionnaire before the assessing officer. The assessing officer passed order on 29th December 2011 assessing the income of the appellant as Rs.90,79,092/-.
3. In the said assessment order, the assessing officer made addition of the income to the extent of Rs.5,35,872/- under three different heads. The assessing officer refused to consider the loss suffered by the assessee on transaction in derivatives while computing net taxable income. The application for rectification under section 154 made by the appellant was rejected by order dated 14th May 2012. On 4th June 2012 the appellant preferred an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) against the assessment order. The appellant did not challenge the additions made by the Assessing Officer.
4. On 27th February 2014, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) passed order refusing to consider the loss suffered by the appellant on transaction in derivatives while computing the net income of the appellant. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal) was of the view that the appellant would not be entitled to set-off loss suffered from transactions in securities because of the provisions of section 73. The Commissioner held that as provided under section 73, the loss suffered by the assessee would be a loss from speculative business and as such the appellant would not be entitled to claim setoff against the income from a non-speculative business.
5. Being aggrieved by the said order, the appellant preferred an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 2nd July 2014. On 31st October 2017 the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dismissed the said appeal. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was of the view that the appellant would not be entitled to claim set-off in view of the provisions of Section 73.
Being aggrieved by the said decision of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, the appellant has preferred this appeal under section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
6. Some of the relevant provisions for deciding this appeal are extracted as un
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.