SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1322

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH
Sunil B. Shukre, M.S. Jawal Kar, J, JJ.
Ankit - Appellant
Versus
Schedule Tribe Caste - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3296 of 2021
Decided On : 05-05-2022

Advocates appeared:
Ashwin Deshpande, Advocate, N.R.Patil, Advocate

The probative value of the oldest document showing the caste as 'Halbi', the binding nature of previous judgments, and the inability of the Committee to express doubt on the genuineness of validity certificates.

Headnote:

Caste Claim - 'Halbi' Schedule Tribe - Constitutional Schedule Tribe Order, 1950 - The court discussed the validity of the caste claim of the petitioner belonging to the 'Halbi' Schedule Tribe. It referenced several documents and validity certificates to support the petitioner's claim. The court highlighted the importance of consanguinity and the probative value of the oldest document showing the caste as 'Halbi'. The court also emphasized the binding nature of previous judgments and the inability of the Committee to express doubt on the genuineness of validity certificates. The final decision quashed the order invalidating the caste claim and directed the Committee to issue a Tribe Validity Certificate to the petitioner.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner claimed to belong to 'Halbi' Schedule Tribe and had submitted various documents and validity certificates to support the claim. The respondent - Committee invalidated the caste claim, leading to the petitioner challenging the order in court.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the respondent - Committee erred in invalidating the caste claim of the petitioner and highlighted the importance of consanguinity and the probative value of the oldest document showing the caste as 'Halbi'. The court also emphasized the binding nature of previous judgments and the inability of the Committee to express doubt on the genuineness of validity certificates.

Issues: Validity of the caste claim, genuineness of documents and validity certificates, authority of the Committee to express doubt on the correctness of validity certificates.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of consanguinity and the probative value of the oldest document showing the caste as 'Halbi'. It also highlighted the binding nature of previous judgments and the inability of the Committee to express doubt on the genuineness of validity certificates.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, the impugned order was quashed and set aside, and the respondent Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee was directed to issue a Tribe Validity Certificate to the petitioner showing that he belongs to 'Halbi' Schedule Tribe.

JUDGMENT

M.S.Jawalkar, J. - Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

2. The petitioner claims to belong to 'Halbi' Schedule Tribe. The Sub-Divisional Officer Revenue, achalpur had issued a Caste Certificate to the petitioner as belongs to 'Halbi'. The petitioner has completed B.E Course (Mechanical) from College of Engineering run by Marathwada Mitra Mandal, Kurvey Nagar, Pune. The petitioner had sent his Caste Claim for verification to the respondent-Schedule Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee (in short, ' the Committee') through the College alongwith relevant documents and validity certificates. as his caste claim was pending since long, he filed a Writ Petition bearing No. 2585/2020 before this Court, in which, the directions were issued to decide the caste claim within 3 months, inspite of it, the caste claim was not decided and thereafter, the petitioner constrained to file a Contempt Petition bearing No. 151/2021 before this Court. During the pendency of the Contempt Petition, the respondent - Committee invalidated the caste claim of the petitioner. Presently, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 22/07/2021 of the respondent - Committee invalidating the caste claim of the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that although there are several validity certificates placed on record, the respondent - Committee without any reason, discarded the same.

4. The petitioner further submits that the 'Halbi' Schedule Tribe is recognized as Schedule Tribe in the State of Maharashtra and included at Sr. No. 19 in the Constitutional Schedule Tribe Order, 1950. The show cause notice was sent to the petitioner alongwith the copy of the Police Vigilence Report dated 09/05/2018 by the respondent - Committee seeking explanation on the said report. The petitioner submitted the detailed reply on the same, stating that, as Police Vigilence in its report came up with some 'Koshti' documents, they are not from the petitioner's family and therefore, there is no relation with these documents and thus the said documents cannot be relied upon. There are 5 validities in the family of the petitioner, which the petitioner placed before the respondent Committee.

5. The petitioner submits that the respondent - Committee has erred in invalidating the caste claim of the petitioner for 'Halba/Halbi' Schedule Tribe Category. The findings recorded by the respondent - Committee are based upon totally irrelevant consideration and factors. It is not the case of the respondent - Committee that the documents placed on record are bogus, false, non-existent or fabricated. all the documents are pertaining to the period prior to 1950 and onwards, unequivocally and undisputedly indicate the claim of the petitioner as 'Halba/Halbi' Schedule Tribe. When the documents on record conclusively establish that the petitioner belongs to 'Halba/Halbi' Schedule Tribe, then it is not permissible for the respondent - Committee to go into affinity test and to reject the claim of the petitioner. The Committee failed to appreciate that the petitioner originally hails from achalpur city which is border area of Melghat and is earmarked for 'Halba/Halbi' Tribals in the map of the Tribal area prepared by the State Government of Maharashtra. The respondent - Committee considered the irrelevant documents and has not given consideration to the genuine documents and also validity certificates which are issued in the family. The allegation is that the documents showing caste as 'Koshti' was suppressed by the applicant/petitioner. However, as those documents do not belong to the petitioner's family, then there is no question of suppression. The oldest documents in respect of the petitioner's grandfather and great great grandfather are of 1920, 1929 and 1930 onwards showing the c

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top