SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1349

NITIN B.SURYAWANSHI
Babasaheb – Appellant
Versus
Yogesh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Rajendra L. Kute, Advocate, S. B. Pulkundwar, Advocate, V. H. Dighe, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Nitin B. Suryawanshi, J. - Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by the consent of the parties.

2. This petition is directed against the order dated 26-07-2021 passed by the Tahsildar, Kopargaon, in Rasta Case (Re-Inquiry) No.152/2021 (Old Rasta Case No.03/2019), which is confirmed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Shirdi Division, Shirdi, in Revision application No.230/2021.

3. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 filed Rasta Case No.03/2019 before the Tahsildar, Kopargaon, under Section 5(2) of the Mamlatdar's Courts act, 1906 (for short 'the act, 1906') claiming that for approaching their land Gut No.58 there was a road on common Bandh of lands bearing Gut No.62/5 and Gut No.57. It is obstructed by the petitioners and respondent Nos. 3 to 6 by putting sand, stones and constructing a shed. Hence, they prayed for removal of the obstruction and clear 12 feet road.

4. Site inspection was conducted on 30-05-2019 wherein it was found that the owner of Gut No.57 had installed iron angles abutting to the boundaries. Though alternate road was tried to be shown from Gut Nos. 60 and 59, however, on that day no access road was found for Gut No.58. On 20-07-2019 the Tahsildar granted

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top