Back
G.S.KULKARNI
Maharashtra Maritime Board – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks permission for public works. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. description of the petitioner's statutory role and responsibilities. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. details of proposed projects and crz relevance. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. clearances obtained and recommendations from mczma. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. importance of the project for public utility. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 6. support for project and necessity for compliance. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 18) |
| 7. opposition and legal rationale from beag. (Para 14 , 19) |
| 8. court's interpretation of relevant laws and principles. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 9. court allows the petition in public interest. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. final orders and compliance requirements. (Para 35 , 38 , 40 , 45) |
JUDGMENT
1. In these three writ petitions, the Petitioner-Maharashtra Maritime Board is before the Court praying for directions against the respondents to permit it to execute public works interalia of construction of proposed passenger jetty and allied facilities at Kelwa, Palghar (in Writ Petition No.759 of 2020); a Ro-Ro Jetty at Kharwadashri (in Writ Petition No.1065 of 2021) and to execute work of construction of proposed jetty and allied facilities at Kharekuran, Thane (in Writ Petitio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
