SANDEEP K.SHINDE
Mukesh P. Meena – Appellant
Versus
CBI, ACB – Respondent
JUDGMENT
S.K.SHINDE, J. - Rule.
2. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the learned counsel for the parties, matter is taken up for final hearing forthwith.
3. This application under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( "Cr.P.C. " for short) challenges the order dated 30th March, 2021, by which the Special Judge, CBI, Greater Bombay, declined to direct investigator to produce the documents sought by the applicant (accused) in CBI Special Case No.45 of 2019.
4. Back-ground facts giving rise to this application are as under:
The Central Bureau of Investigation registered a regular case BA1/2018/A0012 on a written complaint 25th April, 2018 against the applicant, Deputy Commissioner of Customs and others under Sec. 120-B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Sec. 7, 13(2) read with Sec. 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. After completion of investigation, charge-sheet was filed on 28th November, 2019 against the applicant and seven others. Whereafter, applicant-accused approached the trial Court with the prayer that entire material available with the investigator, which was not made part of the charge-sheet, be summoned under Sec. 91 of the Cr.P.C
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.