SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1783

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Ravindra V.Ghuge, S.G.Mehare, JJ.
Ranukai Critical Care Center & Multispecialty Hospital - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 3428 of 2020
Decided On : 23-11-2021

Advocates appeared:
V.S.Kadam, Advocate, S.R.Yadav, Advocate, R.K.Ingole, Advocate

The importance of maintaining records as prescribed under the Act and Rules, and the legal implications of non-compliance.

Headnote:

Sonography Clinic - Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act 1994 - Sec. 17, Sec. 20, Sec. 30, Rule 12, Rule 18-A - The court discussed the provisions of the Act and Rules, including the functions of the Appropriate Authority, powers to issue show-cause notice, search and seizure procedures, and the obligations and duties of the Clinics. The court emphasized the importance of maintaining records as prescribed and the legal implications of non-compliance.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a partnership firm running a Genetic Clinic/ Ultrasound Clinic, challenged the suspension of its Registration Certificate and sealing of the Sonography machine by the District Appropriate Authority. The petitioner contended that it had not violated any provisions of the Act and Rules, and the actions taken against it were mala fide.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the impugned orders were quashed and set aside, directing the un-sealing of the Sonography machine and restoration of the Clinic's registration. The court clarified that its findings should not influence the pending criminal case.

Issues: The issues revolved around the alleged violations of the Act and Rules by the Clinic, the legality of the actions taken by the Appropriate Authority, and the impact of the pending criminal case on the petition.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the importance of maintaining records as prescribed under the Act and Rules, and the legal implications of non-compliance. It also clarified the distinction between the proceedings before the Appropriate Authority and the criminal trial.

Final Decision: The petition was allowed, the impugned orders were quashed, and the Clinic's registration was restored. The court directed the un-sealing of the Sonography machine and clarified that its findings should not influence the pending criminal case.

JUDGMENT

S.G.MEHARE, J.

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By the consent of the learned counsels for the parties, the petition is heard finally.

2. The petitioner, a partnership firm, running a Genetic Clinic/ Ultrasound Clinic ( Non- Invasive) Centre at Nanded, has impugned the orders, suspending the Registration Certificate and sealing the Sonography machine of the petitioner by the District Appropriate Authority/ respondent no.2 dated 20/9/2019 and dismissing the appeal by the state Appropriate Authority dated 7/12/2019.

3. The petitioner is a partnership firm running Renukai Critical Care Centre and Multispeciality Hospital. The petitioner's Hospital is registered as Genetic Clinic/ Ultrasound Clinic ( referred to as 'Clinic ' for short) with the Appropriate Authority under the Pre-conception and Pre-natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act 1994 and Rules made thereunder ( the 'Act and Rules ' for short). It was registered on 19/5/2018 and is valid till 18/5/2023. Respondent no. 2 is the District Appropriate Authority.

4. Respondent no.2 had issued a show-cause notice dated 28/6/2019 to Dr. Nilesh Bastewad, the partner of the Clinic, calling upon him to submit the explanation. It is alleged in the show cause notice that in the visit of an officer authorised on 26.06.2019 to the Hospital, column no. 12 of Form-F is not filled by Dr. Chanda Bastewad. There were discrepancies in her signatures on declaration forms and consent forms of the patients. The signatures of the patients were not noticed on the consent forms. The dates were not mentioned on the declaration and consent forms of the patients. The name and registration of the doctor in column no. 11 of Form-F is not filled. Column no. 17 pertaining to the result of the pre-natal diagnostic procedure to be conveyed is left blank. The sonography registration register was not available. There was an irregularity in the monthly Sonography report submitted to the Appropriate Authority and on the website. One register was not paginated and was not certified for what purpose the petitioner used it. Respondent no.2 mentioned discrepancies of various dates in 20 items.

5. The petitioner/ Clinic had submitted it 's explanation to the show cause on 6/7/2019, contending that none of the provisions of the Act and Rules are violated. Sonography tests are done in the Hospital only by authorised and qualified doctors. The necessary records of such tests conducted in the Hospital are preserved and maintained in the complete sense. The record is also maintained in electronic Form and uploaded on the website as per the instructions issued from time to time.

6. Respondent no.2 passed the impugned order on 20/9/2019 and then drew a spot panchanama on 21/9/2019 in the Clinic in the presence of two witnesses and sealed and seized the sonography machine bearing registration no. USG/NWCMC, of Aeroscan make Digital colour model no. CD25. Immediately after sealing and seizing the machine, he handed it over to Dr. Nilesh Bastewad, the partner of the Hospital, and obtained his signature and acknowledgment on the same panchanama. Respondent no.2 also prepared a possession receipt on the same day.

7. Respondent no.2 filed an affidavit in reply contending that the discrepancies found in the visit to the Clinic are a violation of the various provisions of the Act and Rules. The Hospital has submitted a vague reply to the show cause. The impugned orders are legal and correct. The acts of the Clinic are deliberate. The Clinic has not made legal compliances. That amounts to an offence. Already a regular criminal case is filed in the Court of Judicial Magistrate. The petitioner/ Clinic does not deserve leniency or mercy. The petition is liable to be dismissed

8. Heard the learned Counsel Shri V .S. Kadam for the petitioner and learned AGP Shri Yawalkar for the State and the learned Counsel Shri R. K. Ingole for respondent no.2 at length.

9. We have persued the paper book.

10. The

                                                            Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                                                            1
                                                            2
                                                            3
                                                            4
                                                            5
                                                            6
                                                            7
                                                            8
                                                            9
                                                            10
                                                            11
                                                            SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                                                            supreme today icon
                                                            logo-black

                                                            An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                                                            Please visit our Training & Support
                                                            Center or Contact Us for assistance

                                                            qr

                                                            Scan Me!

                                                            India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                                                            For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                                                            whatsapp-icon Back to top