A.S.CHANDURKAR, G.A.SANAP
Pradeepbabanrao Wankhede – Appellant
Versus
Master Sakashit – Respondent
JUDGMENT
G.A.SANAP,J. - Both these appeals arise out of judgment and decree, dated 9/1/2019, passed in Petition No.C-55 of 2015, under Sec. 20 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956. The learned Judge of the Family Court, Nagpur allowed the petition and awarded the maintenance @ Rs.5000.00 per month from the date of the petition i.e. 27/10/2015. The petitioner, who is the son, has assailed the impugned judgment and decree on the ground that the amount of monthly maintenance is meager and needs to be enhanced. The respondent-father assailed the judgment and decree on the ground that the amount of maintenance awarded by the impugned judgment and decree is excessive and exorbitant.
2. Both the appeals are being disposed of by the common Judgment. Parties in this judgment would be referred by their nomenclature in the petition filed before the Family Court, Nagpur.
3. The facts giving rise to these appeals are as follows:
The petitioner is the son of the respondent. The parents of the petitioner got married on 25/6/2000. The petitioner was born in 2001. It is stated that after marriage the dispute arose between the parents of petitioner. The respondent used to demand the salar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.