SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1727

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Prithviraj K. Chavan, J.
Sakib Khan - Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra - Respondent
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 3157 of 2021
Decided On : 29-12-2021

Advocates appeared:
Anand Mishra, Advocate, Manoj Singh, Advocate, . S.S. Hulke, Advocate, Shivshankar Bhosale, Advocate

The court considered the nature of the dispute and the applicants' cooperation in the investigation to grant interim protection and bail.

Headnote:

Interim Protection - Bail - Dispute over lending - Indian Penal Code

Fact of the Case:

A crime was registered against the applicants for assaulting the complainant's father over a loan dispute. The applicants sought interim protection, claiming they would cooperate with the investigation.

Finding of the Court:

The court granted interim protection to the applicants, allowing them bail on certain conditions, considering the dispute arose from a lending issue and the lack of antecedents.

Issues: Assault over loan dispute, cooperation with investigation, need for custodial interrogation

Ratio Decidendi: The court considered the nature of the dispute and the applicants' cooperation in the investigation to grant interim protection and bail.

Final Decision: The applicants were granted interim protection and bail with specific conditions to cooperate with the investigation and not leave the country without court permission.

JUDGMENT

Prithviraj K. Chavan, J. - Heard the learned Counsel for the applicants, who are husband and wife. a crime bearing No. 1448 of 2021 came to be registered with Malvani Police Station against the applicants for the offences punishable under Sections 325, 324, 323, 504, 506 (II) r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. It is alleged that the complainant had borrowed an amount of Rs.80,000/- from applicant no.2. Despite transferring the amount in the account of applicant no.2 with the ICICI Bank on 18th October, 2021, it is alleged that the applicants assaulted the complainant's father by inflicting fist blow resulting into uprooting of his 8 artificial teeth. It is the contention of the applicants that they too have registered an FIR against the complainant qua the same incident.

3. Heard Mr. Mishra, the learned Counsel for the applicants.

4. The applicants seeks interim protection by contending that they would co-operate with the Investigating Officer and would not flee away from justice till the investigation is completed. It is submitted that the applicants have roots in the society and they are law abiding citizens.

5. On the other hand, the learned aPP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present in the Court, submits that the applicants are not co-operating in the investigation. It is submitted that the custodial interrogation of the applicants is required for recovery of the weapon used by the applicant no.2 in committing the offence.

6. Having considered the respective submissions, in my view, the applicants can be protected by an interim order as there are no antecedents and it appears to be a dispute arose on account of lending of some amount by the applicants to the complainant. Under such circumstances, the following order is expedient :-

ORDER

    (i) In the event of their arrests, the applicants be enlarged on bail on furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/-each with one surety in the like amount.

    (ii) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation on 1st January, 2022, 6th January, 2022 and 12th January, 2022 between 10.00 a.m. to 12.00 noon.

    (iii) The applicants shall not, directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to the complainant or the witnesses.

    (iv) The applicants shall not leave India without the prior permission of the Court.

    (v) The applicants shall deposit their passports, if any, with the Investigating Officer.

    (vi) The applicants shall remain present at the time of final hearing of the application, in view of the request made by the learned additional Public Prosecutor.

    (vii) Stand over to 14th January, 2022.

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon Back to top