SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Bom) 1743

MANISH PITALE
Samraj Construction – Appellant
Versus
Vijayalaxmi Suresh – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
L.Raghunandan, Advocate, Parag Rao, Advocate

JUDGMENT

MANISH PITALE,J.

1. By this writ petition, the Petitioner has challenged order dtd. 7/9/2021 passed by the Court of Ad-hoc Senior Civil Judge, Mapusa, whereby an application for condonation of delay in filing written statement has been dismissed.

2. The Respondent in the present case has filed a suit for declaration and permanent injunction against the Petitioner. On 22/10/2016, the Petitioner was served with summons in the said suit and as per the relevant provision of law, the extended time for filing written statement expired on 18/1/2017.

3. On 17/2/2017, the Petitioner filed an application for rejection of plaint and on the same day filed an application for extension of time to file written statement. The roznama shows that the application for extension of time to file written statement was merely kept in the file of the proceedings and no specific order was passed thereon.

4. On 31/10/2019, the application for rejection of plaint was dismissed and the roznama shows that the case was adjourned to 17/12/2019, for filing of written statement. On the said date, an application was moved on behalf of the Petitioner seeking time to file written statement on the ground of unav

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top