JUDGMENT :

1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant at the admission stage before notice to the respondents.

2. The applicant has filed this application under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ("Cr.P.C.”) for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the respondents/accused by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Newasa, by its order dated 08.06.2022, in Criminal Bail Application No. 177 of 2022.

3. The applicant is the victim and wife of respondent no.1. The hearing was granted to her before the learned Additional Sessions Judge. The learned Sessions Judge has heard the present victim and the learned APP at length and recorded the submissions made by the respective parties.

4. The applicant has raised objections that the learned Sessions Judge did not consider that she was a minor when kidnapped and raped. She was in the custody of the respondents; therefore, she could not immediately lodge the report against them. The respondents have terror in the locality. The learned Sessions Court did not direct the Investigating Officer to produce the materials like a letter written in the handwriting of her father. The learned sessions judge has given unnecessary weig