SUNIL B. SHUKRE, G. A. SANAP
Umakant Ramkrushna Mahure – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Sunil B. Shukre, J.
1. Rule. The rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.
2. It is the contention of Shri Kshirsagar, learned Counsel for the applicants, that the applicants, who are Teachers, were called upon to perform election related duty, which was of updating electoral rolls of State Legislative Assembly elections during working days and teaching hours, which is not permissible in law as per the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission of India vs. St. Mary’s School and others {(2008) 2 SCC 390}, which has been followed by this Court in a bunch of writ petitions starting with Writ Petition No.6718/2019, decided on 18/2/2020. He also submits that though in the said decision, this Court had directed that if any first information report is lodged against Teachers for refusal to perform the election duty during School hours, the same shall not be prosecuted and even then the present first information report bearing No.31/2020 has been registered at Police Station, Hingna. He also seeks support from the communication issued by the Election Commission of India to the Chief Electoral Officers
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.