SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 819

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
M.G. SEWLIKAR, J.
Udaysing Jagmohansing Dikhat - Thakur - Petitioner
Versus
Shaikh Munjer Shaikh Minajoddin & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition No. 8691 of 2022
Decided On : 24-08-2022

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Shri. P.R. Katneshwarkar.
For the Respondent: Shri. H.V. Tungar.

The main legal point established in the judgment is that rejection of plaint is considered a decree within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the CPC, and therefore, it is an appealable order under Section 96 of the CPC.

Headnote:

Decree - Rejection of Plaint - The court held that rejection of plaint is a decree within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the CPC, making it an appealable order under Section 96 of the CPC. The judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sayyed Ayaz Ali Versus Prakash G. Goyal was relied upon to support this interpretation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner filed a Special Civil Suit for declaration, possession, and cancellation of sale deed. The defendant filed an application for rejection of the plaint under Order 7 Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code, which was rejected by the Trial Court. The petitioner challenged this order in a writ petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that rejection of plaint is a decree within the meaning of Section 2(2) of the CPC, and therefore, the writ petition was not maintainable. The writ petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no costs.

Issues: The main issue was whether the rejection of the plaint constituted a decree and was thus appealable under Section 96 of the CPC.

Ratio Decidendi: The court's decision was based on the interpretation of Section 2(2) of the CPC, which defines 'decree' to include the rejection of a plaint, making it an appealable order.

Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and the rule was discharged with no costs.

JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the parties taken up for final hearing at the admission stage.

2. Facts in brief are that the petitioner filed Special Civil Suit No. 14 of 2022 in the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Beed for declaration, possession and cancellation of sale deed.

3. Defendant filed his written statement. The Defendant-respondent No.1 filed application under Order 7 Rule 11 of Civil Procedure Code of rejection of plaint.

4. Learned Trial Court after hearing both the parties rejected the plaint as learned Trial Court found that there was no cause of action. Petitioner has impugned this order in this writ petition.

5. Learned counsel Shri. Tungar for respondent No. 1 submits that writ petition is not maintainable against rejection of plaint. For this purpose he placed reliance on the case of Sayyed Ayaz Ali Versus Prakash G. Goyal reported in 2021 (7) Laws (SC) 19.

6. I have heard learned counsel of both the sides extensively.

7. Section 2(2) of Code of Civil Procedure defines expression ‘Decree’ it reads thus :

    2. Definitions.- In this Act, unless there is anything repugnant in the subject or context,-

(1)….

(2) “decree” means the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the Court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit and may be either preliminary or final. It shall be deemed to include the rejection of a plaint and the determination of any question within section 144, but shall not include-

(a) any adjudication from which an appeal lies as an appeal from an order, or

(b) any order of dismissal for default.”

8. This definition makes it explicit that rejection of plaint is a decree within the meaning of expression decree. Appeal against decree is preferred under Section 96 of the CPC. Therefore, it is an appealable order.

9. Learned counsel Shri. Katneshwarkar for the petitioner submits that in order to be a decree there has to be a formal expression by the Court determining the rights of the parties conclusively. He submits that under Order 7 Rule 11 of the CPC plaint can be rejected on the ground of undervaluation and non correction despite the order of the Court, not supplying duplicate copy of the plaint. He submits that in these eventualities it cannot be said that there is formal expression by the Court of determining the rights of the parties conclusively. These submissions are stated to be rejected. As indicated earlier the definition of decree covers rejection of plaint. Therefore, writ petition is not maintainable. This Court is fortified in its view by the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sayyed Ayaz Ali Versus Prakash G. Goyal (supra) in paragraph No.12. The Hon’ble Supreme Court recorded following observations.

    “12. Section 2(2) of the CPC defines the expression ‘decree’ in the following terms:

“(2) “decree” means the formal expression of an adjudication which, so far as regards the Court expressing it, conclusively determines the rights of the parties with regard to all or any of the matters in controversy in the suit and may be either preliminary or final. It shall be deemed to include the rejection of a plaint and the determination of any question within section 144, but shall not include-

(a) any adjudication from which an appeal lies as an appeal from an order, or

(b) any order of dismissal for default.

Explanation-A decree is preliminary when further proceedings have to be taken before the suit can be completely disposed of. It is final when such adjudication completely disposes of the suit. It may be partly preliminary and partly final;

Order 7 Rule 13 provides that the rejection of the plaint “on any of the grounds hereinbefore mentioned shall not of its own force preclude the plaintiff from presenting a fresh plaint in respect of the same cause of action.

The definition of “decree” in Section 2(2) “shall be deemed to include the rejec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top