SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 887

IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY(NAGPUR BENCH)
G.A. SANAP, SUNIL B. SHUKRE, JJ.
Hasankhan S/o Jabajkhan & Anr. – Appellants
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 149, 150, 151, 448 of 2012, 309 of 201 6
Decided on : 27-07-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Shri Adwait S. Manohar
For the Respondent: Shri P.R. Agrawal

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 147, 148, 302 r/w 149, 326 r/w 149 - Murder and attempted murder - Convicted accused sentenced to life imprisonment and fines for offences of murder and grievous hurt; State appeals acquittal of co-accused - Prosecution failed to prove involvement of the accused beyond reasonable doubt due to inconsistencies in eyewitness accounts and lack of credible corroborating evidence - Benefit of doubt granted to acquitted accused despite claims of enmity - Evidence presented was found to be shaky and tainted, asserting the principle that reliable and consistent evidence is required for conviction. (Paras 6, 12, 40, 54)

Table of Content
1. the court outlines the context of appeals against convictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details of the charges and convictions against the accused. (Para 4 , 11)
3. description of the incident leading to the charges. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9)
4. defense arguments highlighting flaws in prosecution's case. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. prosecution argues evidential support for its claims. (Para 17 , 18)
6. evidence from medical professionals corroborates claims. (Para 19 , 20)
7. evaluating the integrity of witness testimonies. (Para 24 , 32)
8. contradictions in witness statements undermine their credibility. (Para 33 , 34)
9. legal precedents support the need for reliable witness evidence. (Para 51 , 52)
10. conclusion regarding the acquittal of accused based on insufficient evidence. (Para 53 , 54)

JUDGMENT :

G.A. SANAP, J.

1. These criminal appeals arise out of the same incident and as such those are being decided by this common judgment.

2. In this judgment, the appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 149/12, 150/12, 151/12 and 309/16 and the respondents in Criminal Appeal No.448/12 would be referred by their numbers and nomenclature before the trial Court.

3. Criminal Appeal No.149/2012 is filed by Hasankhan Jabajkhan (original accused no.2) and Nadimoddin Najmoddin (original accused no.4) ; Criminal Appeal No. 150/2012 is filed by Firozkhan alias Firdoskhan Jabajkhan (original accused no.3) and Shamiullakhan Anwarkhan (original accused no.21) ; Criminal Appeal No. 151/2012 is filed by Ijajkhan Jabajkhan Pathan (original accused no.1) and Ziullahkhan Jakaullahkhan (original accused no.18) ; and Criminal Appeal No. 309/2016 is filed by Nasrullah Khan Jabaj Khan (accused in S.T. No.19/2013), challenging their conviction. Criminal Appeal No. 448/2012 is filed by the State of Maharashtra, challenging acquittal of remaining 17 accused persons and also acquittal of the appellants/accused nos.1 to 4, 18 and 21 for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .

4. In a crime bearing No. 11/2008, registered with Police Station, Ner, district Yavatmal, 24 persons were charge-sheeted. Initially, Sessions Trial No. 63/2008 was registered against all these accused persons. However, at the stage of trial, accused no.17 Nasrullah Khan was absconding and therefore, his trial was separated. Out of 23 accused persons, learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal after conducting a full fledged trial, found six accused persons, namely accused no.1 – Ijajkhan Jabajkhan Pathan, accused no.2- Hasankhan Jabajkhan, accused no.3 – Firozkhan @ Firdoskhan S/o Jabajkhan, accused no.4- Nadimoddin Najmoddin, accused no.18 – Ziyaullahkhan Jakaullakhan and accused no.21 -Shamiullahkhan Anwarkhkan, guilty of the offences punishable under Sections 147 , 148, 302 r/w 149 and 326 r/w 149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE and convicted them for these offences by the judgment and order dated 29.02.2012. The learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the remaining accused persons of all the charges.

The sentences awarded to the convicted accused are as follows :

    (i) The appellants/accused nos.1 to 4, 18 and 21 are sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.3,000/- each and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months, for the offence punishable under 302 read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

    (ii) They are sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for five years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000/- each and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for three months, for the offence punishable under Section 326 read with Section 149 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .

    (iii) The appellants/ accused nos.1to 4, 18 and 21 are further sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for six months and to pay a fine of Rs.1,000/- each and in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month for the offence punishable under Section 147 of the INDIAN PENAL CODE .

    (iv) They are also sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top