Back
G.A.SANAP, SUNIL B.SHUKRE
Hasankhan S/o Jabajkhan – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court outlines the context of appeals against convictions. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. details of the charges and convictions against the accused. (Para 4 , 11) |
| 3. description of the incident leading to the charges. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9) |
| 4. defense arguments highlighting flaws in prosecution's case. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. prosecution argues evidential support for its claims. (Para 17 , 18) |
| 6. evidence from medical professionals corroborates claims. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. evaluating the integrity of witness testimonies. (Para 24 , 32) |
| 8. contradictions in witness statements undermine their credibility. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 9. legal precedents support the need for reliable witness evidence. (Para 51 , 52) |
| 10. conclusion regarding the acquittal of accused based on insufficient evidence. (Para 53 , 54) |
JUDGMENT :
G.A. SANAP, J.
1. These criminal appeals arise out of the same incident and as such those are being decided by this common judgment.
2. In this judgment, the appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos. 149/12, 150/12, 151/12 and 309/16 and the respondents in Criminal Appeal No.448/12 would be referred by their numbers and nomenclature before the trial Court.
3. Criminal Appeal No.149/2012 is file
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
