SHRIKANT D.KULKARNI
Dinesh Dilip Malu – Appellant
Versus
Omprakash Sagarmal Saboo – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.
1. The petitioner has challenged the common order passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad below Exhibit-76 and 77 in SCC No. 5349 of 2016 thereby rejecting his prayer for permission to lead further defence evidence and forward the cheque in dispute to the Hand Writing Expert for opinion, which is upheld by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad in Criminal Revision Application No. 94 of 2022.
2. The petitioner is facing prosecution for the offence punishable under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter called as ‘the said Act’ for the sake of convenience). He has applied to the learned Magistrate vide exhibit 76 and sought permission to lead further defence evidence by setting aside the evidence close order. He further applied to the learned Magistrate to forward the cheque in dispute to the hand writing expert for opinion in view of specifc defence raised by the petitioner that cheque in dispute signed by him but blank was lost alongwith important documents and he has given instructions to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.