JUDGMENT :

BHARATI DANGRE, J.

1. The present Appeal is filed by the Board of Control for Cricket of India (hereinafter referred to as ‘BCCI’), being aggrieved by the impugned judgment and order passed by the Employees Insurance Court at Bombay (ESI Court dated 9/9/2021, declaring that the BCCI is covered within the meaning of ‘shop’ as per notification dated 18th September 1978 issued by the Government of Maharashtra under the provisions of Section 1(5) of the Employees State Insurance Act and the ESI Court, has remitted the matter for determining the contribution from the appellant Board in the wake of the observations made in the impugned judgment.

2. In support of the Appeal, I have heard the learned Advocate Mr. Aditya Thacker with Mr.Rahul Dev i/b Argus Partners for the appellant and Mr.Shailesh Pathak along with Jay Vora for the respondent.

Since the parties expressed their desire to argue the Appeal finally and have placed on record the compilation of documents, and also the compilation of the relevant judgments on which they seek to place reliance, at the request of the par