RAVINDRA V.GHUGE ANIL L.PANSARE
Shivaji s/o Pundlikrao Darade – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGEMENT :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally, with the consent of the parties.
2. The identically placed petitioners have putforth prayer Clauses (B), (C) and (D), as under :
(C) By issuing writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, or writ of mandamus like nature and to directing the respondents to pay the regular pension and family pension and its consequential and also direction to pay the arrears of 6th Pay Commission and the time bound pay scale as per the G.R. dated 01.04.2010.
(D) Pending hearing and final disposal of the writ petition direction like nature and direct the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to declare that the petitioners are permanent Employe
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.