S.G.DIGE
Babarao Vithoba Muthal – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Raheman Abdul Sattar – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and award passed by the Member, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Osmanabad, the appellants – original claimants have preferred this appeal for enhancement of amount.
2. Brief facts of the case are as under :-
3. The appellants filed claim petition for getting compensation before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Osmanabad (For short, “the Tribunal”). Considering the evidence on record and after hearing the parties, the Tribunal has awarded compensation. Against the said judgment and order this appeal.
4. It is the contention of the learned counsel for the appellants that the Tribunal has not properly considered the income of the deceased. The deceased was contractor and he was earning Rs.15,000/- per month, therefore, the compensation should have been granted by considering his income, but less income
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.