SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 1097

G.A.SANAP
Kiran Arjunsingh Rathod – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Saurabh Yerawar, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. A.R.Chutke, Adv

JUDGMENT :

1. Heard.

2. This appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 01.01.2020 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions Trial No.100 of 2014, whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge, convicted the appellants for the offences punishable under Sections 307 and 324 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant No.1 is convicted for the offence punishable under Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code. The sentence awarded to them on different counts is as under:

    (i) Appellant Nos.1 to 3 are sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 5 (five) years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/- (Rs.One Thousand only) each, and in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for 3 (Three months) under Section 307 r/w of the Indian Penal Code.

(ii) Appellant Nos.1 to 3 are sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 2 (Two) years and to pay fine of Rs.500/- (Rs.Five hundred only) each and in default to suffer Simple Imprisonment for 3 (Three) months under Section 324 r/w of the Indian Penal Code.

(iii) Appellant No.1 is sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 2 (two) years and to pay fine of Rs.1,000/-(Rs.One Thousand Only) and in default to suffer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top