K.R.SHRIRAM, MILIND N.JADHAV
Union of India, through the Commissioner of Customs (Import) – Appellant
Versus
Customs & Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additional Bench Mumbai – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
K.R. Shriram, J.
1. Petitioner – Union of India is impugning an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Office of the Settlement Commission, Additional Bench, Customs and Central Excise, Mumbai under section 127C (5) of the Customs Act, 1962 (“the Act”).
2. Mr. Jetly stated that petitioner is challenging the impugned order on two grounds:-
(b) Settlement Commission could not have interpreted classification of the goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975.
3. Before we go into the details, as regards the first point, in paragraph 2 of the petition, it is stated the challenge is to the extent that it classifies Motor-home imported by respondent No. 1 under Custom Tariff Heading (CTH) 87.02 as against 87.03 held by the revenue department. The challenge on jurisdiction because no show-cause-notice was issued is not a grievance raised in the petition. In any event, when we consider the documents annexed to the petition, the admitted position was oral show-cause-notice had been issued which was permissib
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.