SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Bom) 924

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Nitin Jamdar, N.R. Borkar, JJ.
Hany Babu - Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency (FIR No. 1 of 2020) and ors. – Respondents
Criminal Appeal No. 351 of 2022
Decided On : 19-09-2022

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Dr. Yug Mohit Chaudhary
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil C. Singh, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Sandesh Patil, Mr. Chintan Shah, Ms. S.D. Shinde, Assistant Public Prosecutor

Headnote:(A) National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 - Section 21(4); Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 - Sections 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 38, 39, 40; Indian Penal Code - Sections 121, 121A, 124A, 153A, 505(1)(b) - Criminal Appeal for bail - Accused part of a banned terrorist organization (CPI (Maoist)) involved in a conspiracy to undermine the State through violence - Material recovered establishes active participation in terrorist activities - Bail application rejected as prima facie evidence shows complicity in conspiracy against State - Findings align with the objectives of CPI (Maoist) to establish a 'people's government' through armed struggle - Court emphasizes the serious nature of offences and affirms detention as appropriate. (Paras 1-58)

Facts of the case:
The appeal from a Special Court's refusal of bail in connection with serious charges against accused due to alleged membership in a terrorist organization involved in violent actions to destabilize governmental authority. Key evidence includes documents detailing the objectives, strategies, and activities of the CPI (Maoist).

Findings of Court:
Sufficient grounds to believe accusations against the Appellant as prima facie true, including links with criminal conspiracies and ongoing threats to State security.

Issues: Whether Appellant's actions constituted promoting enmity, membership in a terrorist organization, and whether there was a prima facie case for bail.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court affirmed that evaluation of guilt is not the court's duty at the bail stage but to determine if accusations are plausible based on evidence.

Result: Appeal dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to bail based on accusations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of the nia's case against the appellant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. assessment of cpi (maoist) organization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. legal repercussions under ipc and uap act. (Para 9 , 10)
5. arguments presented for and against bail. (Para 11 , 12)
6. court's considerations on bail application. (Para 13 , 14)
7. judicial interpretation of uap provisions. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. standard for considering prima facie evidence. (Para 18 , 19)
9. role and implication of the appellant in conspiracy. (Para 20 , 32)
10. seriousness of the charges and evidence against the appellant. (Para 49 , 50)
11. court's rationale for denying bail. (Para 54 , 56)
12. conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 58 , 59)

JUDGMENT :

Nitin Jamdar, J.

By this appeal filed under Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, the Appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2022 passed by the Special Court (NIA), Greater Mumbai rejecting the application filed by the Appellant for bail. The Appellant prays that he may be released on bail on such reasonable terms and conditions as the Court may deem fit.

2. The Appellant is accused No.12 in Special Case No.414/2022, pending before the Special Court (NIA), Greater Mumbai. The Appellant was arrested on 28 July 2020. According to Respondent NIA, the investigation has revealed that the Appellant and the other named accused are members of the Communist Party of India (Maoist)-CPI (Maoist), a banned terrorist organisation and are deeply involved in furthering its agenda through different means. The main agenda of CPI (Maoist) was to establish a 'people's Government' by a revolution aided by a protracted armed struggle to undermine and seize power from the State. According to Respondent NIA, the Appellant is alleged of the offences punishable under the INDIAN PENAL CODE (IPC) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (UAP Act.)

3. Facts leading to this appeal, as seen from the supplementary charge sheet filed by NIA, are as follows.

3.1 An FIR No. 4 of 2018 was filed on 8 January 2018, stating that a program was organised at Shaniwar Wada, Pune, on 31 December 2017 under the banner of one Elgar Parishad. Short plays, dances and songs were performed on the stage. The speakers gave provocative speeches and distributed pamphlets. The performances were also provocative and had the effect of disrupting communal harmony. The Complainant stated that the banned terrorist organisation CPI (Maoist) had a role in organising the program. It wanted to inculcate and boost its ideology and thoughts amongst the impoverished classes and misguide them toward violent unconstitutional activities. The activists of Kabir Kala Manch, who performed at the event, perpetuating the object of CPI (Maoist) with distorted historical narration, incited the masses by raising objectionable slogans. This led to violence and the death of an innocent person near Bhima Koregaon near Pune on 1 January 2018.

3.2 Houses of Rona Wilson, Surendra Gadling, Sudhir Dhawale, Harshali Potdar, Sagar Gorakhe, Deepak Dhengale, Ramesh Gaichor and Jyoti Jagtap were searched by the police. The articles and material seized during the search were sent to Forensic Science Lab, Pune. The analysis of seized electronics/digital articles confirmed that the accused Surendra Gadling, Rona Wilson, Shoma Sen, Mahesh Raut, Comrade M. @ Milind Teltumbade (now deceased), Comrade Prakash @ Navin @ Ritupan Goswami (absconding), Comrade Manglu (absconding), Comrade Dipu (absconding) were involved in the crime. During the investigation, the investigating officer invoked the provisions of Sections 13 , 16, 17, 18, 18(B), 20, 38, 39, and 40 of the UAP Act.

3.3 The accused Surendra Gadling, Rona Wilson and Sudhir Dhawale were arrested on 6 June 2018. The residences of Shoma Sen and

        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
        1
        2
        3
        4
        5
        6
        7
        8
        9
        10
        11
        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
        supreme today icon
        logo-black

        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

        Please visit our Training & Support
        Center or Contact Us for assistance

        qr

        Scan Me!

        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

        whatsapp-icon Back to top