Hany Babu vs National Investigation Agency (FIR No. 1 of 2020)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(Bom) 924

NITIN JAMDAR, N.R.BORKAR
Hany Babu – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency (FIR No. 1 of 2020) – Respondent

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Dr. Yug Mohit Chaudhary
For the Respondent: Mr. Anil C. Singh, Additional Solicitor General with Mr. Sandesh Patil, Mr. Chintan Shah, Ms. S.D. Shinde, Assistant Public Prosecutor

Table of Content
1. challenge to bail based on accusations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. background of the nia's case against the appellant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. assessment of cpi (maoist) organization. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
4. legal repercussions under ipc and uap act. (Para 9 , 10)
5. arguments presented for and against bail. (Para 11 , 12)
6. court's considerations on bail application. (Para 13 , 14)
7. judicial interpretation of uap provisions. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
8. standard for considering prima facie evidence. (Para 18 , 19)
9. role and implication of the appellant in conspiracy. (Para 20 , 32)
10. seriousness of the charges and evidence against the appellant. (Para 49 , 50)
11. court's rationale for denying bail. (Para 54 , 56)
12. conclusion and dismissal of appeal. (Para 58 , 59)

JUDGMENT :

Nitin Jamdar, J.

By this appeal filed under Section 21 (4) of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, the Appellant has challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2022 passed by the Special Court (NIA), Greater Mumbai rejecting the application filed by the Appellant for bail. The Appellant prays that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2022 Supreme(Bom) 924

NITIN JAMDAR, N.R.BORKARHany Babu – AppellantVersusNational Investigation Agency (FIR No. 1 of 2020) – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

NITIN JAMDAR, N.R.BORKAR
Hany Babu – Appellant
Versus
National Investigation Agency (FIR No. 1 of 2020) – Respondent