K.R.SHRIRAM, A.S.DOCTOR
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Union of India (Through the Secretary) Ministry of Law and Justice, Department of Legal Affairs – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. By consent of learned counsel for parties, Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally.
2. The present Writ Petition impugns,
ii. An order dated 30th March, 2022 (“impugned order”) passed by Respondent No. 3 against Petitioner.
3. The facts briefly stated are that between the years 2008 and 2009 Respondent No. 3 issued the impugned notices to Petitioner inter alia alleging that Petitioner had contravened provisions of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004. The impugned notices on this premise called upon Petitioner to show cause why Central Excise Duty along with interest and penalty should not be recovered from Petitioners. The details of the impugned notices (date, period and amount demanded) are as follows, viz.
| Date | Period | Amount Demanded |
| 03.04.2008 | March 03 to March 08 | Rs.1,07,95,975.00 |
| 02.05.2008 | April 07 to June 07 | Rs.4,85,185.00 |
| 25.07.2008 | July 07 to September 07 | Rs.17,40,145.00 |
| 24.10.2008 | October 07 to December 07 | |
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.