N. J. JAMADAR
Rajendra Sadashiv Chandrachud – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
ORDER
1. Not on Board. Mentioned. Taken on Production Board.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the applicant.
3. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant could not deposit the sum of Rs.10,00,000/-, in terms of the order, dated 5th April 2022.
4. On 30th March 2022, this Court had passed the following order :
"1. Learned Counsel for the respondent No.2 states that out of the compensation amount of Rs.3,15,00,000/-, the applicant has only deposited about Rs.73,00,000/- i.e. Rs.63,00,000/- in the Shraddha Talekar, PS 1/5 501-REVN-399-2019.doc Appellate Court and Rs.10,00,000/- in this Court. She submits that the applicant be directed to deposit the balance amount of Rs.2,42,00,000/- in this Court.
2. Considering the fact that the trial Court has convicted the applicant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which Judgment and Order of conviction and sentence has been confrmed by the Appellate Court, learned Counsel for the applicant to take instructions and fle an affdavit-cum- undertaking of the applicant how the balance amount of Rs.2,42,00,000/- would be deposited in the Registry of this Court.
3. Stand over to 5th April, 2022. To be placed on the sup
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.