JUDGMENT

Avinash G. Gharote, J. - Hearing was conducted through Video Conferencing and the learned counsels agreed that the audio and visual quality was proper.

2. Heard.

3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of learned counsel for the rival parties.

4. The petition challenges the order dated 28.07.2015, passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Court No. 6, Amravati, under Section 23(2) of the Protection of Women From Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter to be refereed as the 'D.V. Act'), whereby the applicant No. 1/husband, has been directed to pay Rs. 20,000/- (Rs. Twenty Thousand Only) per month to the wife and Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten Thousand Only) per month to the minor son. This order has been confirmed in appeal by the learned Sessions Court by judgment dated 30.04.2019 by dismissing the appeal.

5. Mr. Dhore, learned counsel for the applicants submits, that the judgment of the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Amravati, is an outcome of a result of an intentional suppression practiced by the non-applicant/wife, inasmuch as, though on 20.07.2013 when the complaint under the D.V. Act came to be filed, the non-applicant/wife w