SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 748

ROHIT B. DEO
Joseph B Braganza – Appellant
Versus
State Of Goa – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Aldila Braganza, Advocate, Nikhil Vaze, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. The Registry shall re-register the Petition as a Criminal Writ Petition.

2. Heard Ms Aldila Braganza - Petitioner 2 who is appearing in person and the learned Addl. Public Prosecutor Mr Nikhil Vaze. Rule. With the consent of the parties, the Petition is heard finally.

3. Ms Braganza would submit that the order dtd. 10/5/2023, rendered by the learned District Judge-1 and Addl. Sessions Judge cum Spl. Judge, N.D.P.S. Court in CRMA/124 and CRMA/125 of 2023 whereby a notice issued to the proposed accused, is contrary to the enunciation of law of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in Iqbal Singh Marwah vs. Meenakshi Marwah - (2005) 4 SCC 370 which is referred to and relied upon by a relatively recent decision of the Supreme Court in The State of Punjab vs. Jasbir Singh in Criminal Appeal No. 335/2020 decided on September 15, 2022. Ms Braganza is well justified in the submission that the proposed accused has no right of hearing in the proceedings under Sec. 340 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (Cr.P.C.). The law appears to be well settled in view of the decisions of the Supreme Court, supra.

4. In this view of the matter, the orders impugned whereby the notice is iss

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top