SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 1008

ROHIT B. DEO, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Priti D/o. Ashok – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
S.J.Kadu, Advocate, M.K.Pathan, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Y.G.KHOBRAGADE, J. - Heard.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, heard finally at the stage of admission by consent of the parties.

3. According to the petitioner, she belongs to "Mahar" caste which is Scheduled Caste category at Sr. No. 37 in State of Maharashtra and she was admitted in Shri Gadge Maharaj Vidyalaya and Junior College, Murtizapur, Dist. Akola in 12th standard. Her Collage forwarded her caste claim for scrutiny to respondent 2- Scrutiny Committee. Accordingly, the petitioner submitted various documents alongwith her proposal. However on 13/4/2022, the respondent 2 invalidated her caste claim mainly on the ground that the petitioner failed to produce caste claim documents prior to 1950 so also during the affinity test, the photos of Lord Jesus Christ and portrait of Dr. Bababsaheb Ambedkar were found in the prayer-room of the house of the petitioner and the petitioner is a follower of the Christian religion.

4. The respondent 2- Scrutiny Committee filed reply and strongly resisted claim of the petitioner on the ground that after receipt of the proposal for caste verification of the petitioner, a showcause notice was issued to the petitioner alongwith Vigilan

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top