RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, Y. G. KHOBRAGADE
Vd. Ganesh Sitaram Magar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.
1. Rule. Rule Made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.
2. By the present Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner has put forth prayer clause (B) as under:
3. In short, the grievance of the Petitioner is that, he completed BAMS, M.D. (Ayurveda- Rasshastra). On 21-07-1997, he had joined Respondent No. 5 College as a Lecturer. He was promoted to the post of Professor on 01.07.2000 and superannuated on 30.06.2019 as he attained 60 years of age. However, after retirement, he was served with a notice dated 18.12.2020 issued by Respondent No. 5 thereby directed recovery of Rs. 8,43,782/- (Rs. 6,60,810/- on account of wrong pay fixation, allowances + Rs. 1,82,792/- towards other recovery).
4. Respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have contended that, as per GR dated 08.09.20
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.