SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Bom) 360

REVATI MOHITE DERE, MANJUSHA DESHPANDE
Central Bureau of Investigation, Head of Branch, CBI, Lodhi Road, New Delhi – Appellant
Versus
Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Devang Vyas, ASG a/w Mr. Shreeram Shirsat, Spl. P.P., Ms. Tanvi Mate, Mr. Shekhar Mane and Ms. Karishma Rajesh.
For the Respondents:Mr. Ravi Kadam, Sr. Advocate a/w Mr. Aabad Ponda, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Thomas George, Ms. Tanvi Sinha, Mr. Navankur Pathak, Mr. Aamir Sopariwala, Mr. Jehan Fulwadiwala, Ms. Neeti Nihar and Mr. Aaditya Talwar i/b Saikrishna & Associates, Dr. Abhinav Chandrachud a/w Mr. Rajeev K. Panday, Mr. Madhur Rai and Mr. Sachin Kanse i/b PRS Legal, Mr. Ranjeet V. Sangle a/w Mr. Chaitanya R. Kulkarni, Mr. Abhinav Tewari and Ms. Nehal Dhruv, Ms. A.S. Gotad, A.P.P.

Headnote: Read headnote

ORDER :

Revati Mohite Dere, J.

1. By this petition, preferred by the petitioner-CBI under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the petitioner seeks stay to the release of the docuseries titled “The Indrani Mukerjea Story:Buried Truth”, teasers/trailers in respect of the said docuseries and any other promotional information in any other form on the Over the Top platform of respondent No.1-Netflix Entertainment Services India LLP or any other media outlet by the respondent No.1, till the conclusion of the ongoing trial in SPL. Case CBI No. 117/2015 & SPL. Case CBI No.9/2016.

2. Mr. Vyas, learned ASG submitted that it is imperative to stay the docuseries, inasmuch as, what would emerge from the said docuseries would build a perception in the minds of the people and as such the credibility of witnesses would be questioned. He submitted that even the rights of other witnesses as well as other co-accused would be jeopardized, if the docuseries is permitted to be aired. He submitted that the docuseries will result in seriously prejudicing the admin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top