JUDGMENT/ORDER

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J. - Heard learned counsel for the parties in both the petitions.

2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith, in both the aforesaid petitions, with the consent of the parties and is taken up for final disposal. Mr. Shirsat waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.1 - ED and the learned A.P.P waives notice on behalf of the respondent No.2 -State in both the petitions.

3. By these petitions, preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the petitioner in both the petitions seek identical substantive relief, which reads thus;

<WXY>"18. .... .... .... .... (a) issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, calling the records of the Respondent No.1 pertaining to the ECIR/MBZO-II/01/2020 dtd. 20/2/2020 ("Impugned ECIR") (Exhibit A) and quash and / or set aside the ECIR/MBZO-II/01/2020 dtd. 20/2/2020 ("Impugned ECIR") (Exhibit A), the investigation carried thereunder and all proceedings and actions emanating therefrom against the Petitioner, as being illegal and contra