G. A. SANAP
Babikala Sharad – Appellant
Versus
Siddharth Sukhdeo – Respondent
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. The appeal and revision arise out of the judgment and order dtd. 11/6/2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur and therefore, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Sec. 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (for short "the I.P.C") and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.75, 000.00 and in default of payment of fine to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one year. The learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the accused of main charge under Sec. 302 of the I.P.C.
2. The facts are as follows:
3. It is the case of the prosecution that accused and the informant are residents of same locality. The accused at the relevant time was a Corpor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.