SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Bom) 2065

G. A. SANAP
Babikala Sharad – Appellant
Versus
Siddharth Sukhdeo – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
A.K. Bhangde, Advocate, Amit Chutke, Advocate

JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. The appeal and revision arise out of the judgment and order dtd. 11/6/2009 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur and therefore, the same are being disposed of by this common judgment. The learned Additional Sessions Judge convicted the accused for the offence punishable under Sec. 304 Part II of the Indian Penal Code (for short "the I.P.C") and sentenced him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for two years and to pay a fine of Rs.75, 000.00 and in default of payment of fine to suffer further rigorous imprisonment for one year. The learned Additional Sessions Judge acquitted the accused of main charge under Sec. 302 of the I.P.C.

2. The facts are as follows:

    Informant - Babikala(PW-1) is the wife of deceased Sharad. On the report of the informant, crime bearing No.65/2004 came to be registered initially for the offence punishable under Sec. 324 of the I.P.C. The husband of the informant died in hospital on 22/2/2004 and therefore, the offence punishable under Sec. 302 of the I.P.C. was added in the said crime.

3. It is the case of the prosecution that accused and the informant are residents of same locality. The accused at the relevant time was a Corpor

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top