IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Anil S.Kilor, J.
Mala Rajesh Chauhan - Appellant
Versus
Minister , Rural Development - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 6976/2022
Decided On : 15-06-2023
DISQUALIFICATION - Sarpanch Disqualification under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act - Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, Sec. 39(1) - The court discussed the provisions of Sec. 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959, which allows for disqualification of a Sarpanch based on misconduct. The court highlighted the serious findings of the Chief Executive Officer regarding misuse of power and irregularities in tender processes, which were not adequately considered by the Divisional Commissioner. The court emphasized the need for a comprehensive review of all findings before a decision on disqualification is made.
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. Heard.
2. This matter pertains to disqualification of the petitioner as a Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat, Chirodi. The petitioner was disqualified by the Divisional Commissioner, Amravati vide order dtd. 20/5/2022 and the said order of disqualification was confirmed by the Hon'ble Minister vide order dtd. 20/10/2022. Thus, the above referred orders are subject matter of the present writ petition.
3. Since, in this matter the disqualification of the petitioner was sought under Sec. 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959. The enquiry was conducted by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Amravati and submitted his report dtd. 11/1/2022 to the Divisional Commissioner. The findings recorded by the Chief Executive Officer are as below:-
3] Advertisement published by the Gram Panchayat did not mention providing the facility of drinking water to Z.P Schools with 'Sintex Tank'. It revealed that the Sarpanch and the Secretary have not only accepted the tenders but have approved the same. No publicity was given for the said work. 4] It is necessary for the Gram Panchayat to take administrative approval of the members, by holding monthly meeting in respect of the work of 15th Finance Commission. But it is seen that no such administrative approval has been sought.
5] Under Resolution No.5 of the monthly meeting held on 27/04/2021, total tenders of Rs.1, 50, 000.00 ie. Rs.1, 00, 000.00 for providing drinking water facility with 'Sintex' tank to Z.P. School and Rs.50, 000.00 for providing drinking water facility with the tank to Anganwadi, has been approved from 15th Finance Commission Funds. But, the tender submitted by Raj Infratech, Amravati, for the said work has been received by Gram Panchayat on 7/7/2021(07/07/2021). Thus, when the Gram-Panchayat was not in receipt of the tender, on what basis it was approved? From this, it appears that the Sarpanch and the Secretary, by misleading the Panchayat, passed the resolution. Date of receipt of tenders is not mentioned on other tenders. It is seen that irregularity up to a great extent has been committed in the said matter.
6] It is seen that the Sarpanch and the Secretary, while preparing technical estimate of the work viz: 1) Providing drinking water facility to Z.P. School with fitting of 'Sintex' tank - Rs.1, 00, 000.00, 2) drinking water facility to Anganwadi, with tap connection and fitting of the tank - Rs.50, 000.00 3) Electric connection and electric fitting to Anganwadi - Rs.50, 000.00, prepared the estimate and took action with regard to complete the work, without obtaining any technical guidance and technical approval what-so-ever for it.
7] It was shown that the Gram-Panchayat has approved the tenders for providing drinking water facility with 'Sintex' tank to Zilla Parishad School and drinking water facility with the tank, to Anganwadi, in its monthly meeting held on 27/04/2021. But, It is seen that the Administrative Sanction Order was issued in favour of Raj Infratech, Amravati on 23/03/2021 itself. It was also seen that the tender of electric fitting to Anganwadi was approved in the monthly meeting held on 30/08/2021 and the Supply Order was iss
Section 14 (1)(g) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1958 aims to disqualify a Sarpanch who misuses their position by misappropriating public money through contracts awarded to relatives.
Mandatory notice to the panchayat in an inquiry under Section 39(1) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act is essential, and failure to comply renders the inquiry report and subsequent orders inva....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the removal of the petitioner from the post of Sarpanch was illegal and beyond the scope of Section 57(1) of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993.
Writ court may dismiss challenge to unreasoned removal order if quashing revives illegal exoneration, upholding merits where consistent tender violations establish misconduct sans misappropriation.
Subjective satisfaction of the Commissioner on disgraceful conduct justifies disqualification without a conviction under the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act.
Compliance with the principles of natural justice and the authority of the Chief Executive Officer under Section 92 of the M.P. Panchayat Raj Avam Gram Swaraj Adhiniyam, 1993.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.