JUDGMENT/ORDER

1. Heard.

2. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

3. Heard finally with the consent of the learned counsels for the respective parties.

4. Both these matters are filed challenging the order passed by the Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Umrer Taluka against the petitioner thereby issuing the recovery certificate under Sec. 101 of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

5. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that first of all no procedure has been followed as provided under Rule 86A to 86F and that no case is registered on an application filed by respondent No.2. He submits that though notice was issued to the petitioner to appear on 15/9/2023, the concerned Assistant Registrar, Umrer was himself absent. No opportunity was given to the petitioner to file any reply or contest the said proceedings. He submits that the impugned order is passed mechanically and without application of mind and more specifically such order nowhere show a case number, the date of order or the person who appeared before him on the day when the matter was fixed.

6. Learned AGP would submit that the instructions are awaiting and therefore, the matter cou