Back
BHARATI DANGRE
Rajesh Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Uma Constructions – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes about the partnership's operations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. alleged breaches and motions for relief. (Para 4 , 5 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. recognizing partnership terms and clauses. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. disputes regarding asset allocation and ownership. (Para 10 , 21 , 29) |
| 5. agreements about development and rights assigned. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. implications of financial liabilities for partners. (Para 20 , 22 , 25) |
| 7. status quo measures regarding the assets. (Para 28 , 30 , 36) |
| 8. standards governing emergency receiver appointment. (Para 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 9. judicial discretion concerning asset management. (Para 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 10. conclusion drawn from the totality of arguments. (Para 59 , 60 , 63) |
JUDGMENT/ORDER
1. The dispute involved in the three Commercial Arbitration Petitions being fled as petition numbers CARBP No.264/2022, CARBP No.185/2022 and CARBP No.16341/2022, revolve around the affairs and assets of the partnership frm M/s. Uma Constructions (hereinafter referred to as 'the frm'). The frm presently comprises of three partners, Mr Rajesh Sharma, Mr Sunil Sharma and Mr Sunny Ramani. Mr Rajesh Sharma and Mr Sunil Sharma (hereinafter referred to as Sharmas/Sharma broth
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
