MANGESH S. PATIL, SHAILESH P. BRAHME
Kunal – Appellant
Versus
State Of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Mangesh S. Patil, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. AGP waives service. We have heard both the sides finally at the stage of admission.
2. These are six different writ petitions which have been clubbed by the administrative order for being tried by the same Court, since all these petitioners are stated to be blood relatives through paternal side and are impugning the judgments and orders passed in their respective matters by the respondent - scheduled tribe certificate scrutiny committee (hereinafter "committee") whereby, in a proceeding under section 7 of the Maharashtra Act No. XXIII of 2001, their tribe certificates of Thakur scheduled tribe have been confiscated and cancelled.
3. Though the impugned judgments and orders are separate, all these petitioners being blood relatives and have been relying upon same genealogy and evidence, at the joint request of the parties and in order to avoid rigmarole, we propose to decide these petitions by this common order.
4. The chquered history leading to these petitions may be summarized as under:-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.