SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 853

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Bharat Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. - Petitioner
Vs.
Rahul Sudhindra Soni - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 334 of 2026
Decided On : 05-05-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Lancy D'souza with Ms. Deepika Agarwal i/b Mr. V. M. Parkar
For the Respondent: Mr. Shailesh S. Pathak

Employer justified in withholding relieving letter/service certificate from employee breaching training bond by premature resignation without notice or damages; Industrial Court cannot grant interim direction for issuance pending contract enforcement.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Section 28 - Industrial Disputes - Interim relief - Industrial Court erred in directing employer to issue relieving letter/service certificate to employee who breached service bond by resigning prematurely without serving notice period or paying liquidated damages of Rs.10 lakhs - Employer justified in withholding documents as resignation not accepted due to contractual breach - Service bonds enforceable to retain trained workforce, even if training costs borne by client; not violative of Section 27, Indian Contract Act, 1872 if reasonable - Employee cannot insist on certificates to aid securing alternative employment while in breach. (Paras 10, 15, 18, 20, 22)

(B) Employment Contracts - Restrictive covenants - Valid for minimum service tenure post-training to curb attrition and protect investment in specialized skills - Courts enforce bonds; employee must comply with notice and damages before relief. (Paras 17, 21)

Facts of the case:
Employer provided specialized training to employee via client arrangement; employee executed 3-year service bond post-training on specific date. Employee resigned via email without 60 days' notice or damages payment, ceased duties, demanded relieving letter/service certificate. Filed complaint alleging unfair labour practice seeking documents and dues; Industrial Court granted interim direction to issue documents, challenged by employer in writ petition.

Findings of Court:
Impugned interim order set aside; prima facie, employer justified in non-issuance; Industrial Court to decide complaint expeditiously; respondent may offer pro-rata damages for consideration.

Issues: Whether Industrial Court can direct issuance of relieving letter/service certificate at interim stage despite employee's breach of training bond; validity of withholding documents pending damages recovery.

Ratio Decidendi: Breach of bond creates right to withhold documents as consequential to non-acceptance of invalid resignation; bonds protect against poaching of trained staff; no duty to assist breaching employee in new employment; prima facie findings not final.

Result: Writ petition allowed; impugned order set aside.

Table of Content
1. employee breached training bond by premature resignation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. parties argue over interim relief and bond validity. (Para 6 , 7)
3. bond terms breached; training and resignation admitted. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
4. courts enforce bonds; withholding certificate justified. (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
5. no duty to issue relieving letter pre-damages payment. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22)
6. interim order set aside; expedite complaint adjudication. (Para 23 , 24 , 25)

Judgment:

SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

1) The Petition involves an interesting issue as to whether the Industrial Court can direct the employer to issue relieving letter/service certificate to the employee who, after securing training, leaves the job before completion of the service agreed in the Bond executed by him with the employer.

2) Petitioner-employer is aggrieved by interlocutory order dated 13 January 2025 passed by the Member, Industrial Court, Mumbai on Application at Exhibit U-2 filed in Complaint (ULP) No. 450 of 2024 by which the Industrial Court has directed Petitioner to issue Relieving Letter / Service Certificate to the Respondent.

3) Respondent has executed a bond in favour of the Petitioner on 7 November 2022 for serving the Petitioner for a period of three years after securing training. However, the Respondent has left the employment of the Petitioner before completion of the bond period. On that account, Petitioner did not issue him Experience Certificate and Relieving Letter. The Respondent has filed Complaint (ULP) No. 450 of 2024 before Industrial Court, Mumbai for issuance of Relieving Letter as well as for payment of monetary dues and unpaid remuneration. In that Complaint, interim order is passed by the Industrial Court for issuance of Relieving Letter / Service Certificate, which interim order is the subject matter of challenge in the present Petition.

4) Petitioner No. 1 is private limited company engaged in the business of providing engineering services to various foreign airlines such as American Airlines, United Airlines, British Airways etc. Petitioner No. 2 is the director of Petitioner No. 1. Respondent was appointed in the service of the Petitioner with effect from 1 February 2019. According to the Petitioner, the Respondent agreed to undergo training on Boeing B777 aircraft to be conducted by its client-American Airlines for securing endorsement/authorization for his engineering license for becoming a qualified/certified engineer. The cost of the training was to be incurred by Petitioner's client-American Airline. On 7 November 2022, Respondent executed Agreement with the Petitioner for undergoing specialized training conducted by American Airlines during the period from 24, 25, 26 October 2022 and from 31 October to 4 November 2022. Under the Agreement, Petitioner had the option of requiring the Respondent to serve it for a period of 3 years upon completion of the training. The Respondent had option of leaving employment by giving 60 days’ notice, but subject to payment of liquidated damages of Rs. 10 lakhs. According to Petitioner, Respondent successfully completed the training imparted by American Airlines. According to the Petitioner, Respondent was contractually obliged to serve with the Petitioner from 7 November 2022 to 6 November 2025. However, Respondent submitted his resignation vide email dated 9 April 2024 without serving 60 days’ notice and without paying liquidated damages of Rs. 10 lakhs. He stopped attending duties from 12 April 2024. Respondent started demanding for a relieving letter and service certificate, which was denied by the Petitioners.

5) Respondent therefore filed complaint of unfair labour practice being Complaint (ULP) No. 450 of 2024 under Section 28 of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 (MRTU & PULP Act) seeking direction against Petitioner for issuance of relieving letter acknowledging service period and excel

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top