SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.S.YADAV
State of Punjab – Appellant
Versus
H. S. Dhillon – Respondent


JUDGMENT

B. S. Yadav, J. - On coming to know that the accused H. S. Dhilon (now respondent) was stocking insecticides in the shop in dispute situated at Talwandi Road, Zira, with out a licence, P.W. 3 Hardip Singh, exercising powers under the Insecticides Act, 1958, went to that shop. He found that shop locked. He placed another lock on the lock already placed on the shop. He also placed a notice on the shop to the effect that its proprietor should contact the Plant Protection Inspector, Zira, (i.e. P.W. 3 Hardip Singh). On 3rd February, 1976, Jagmohan Singh, Sales representative of the accused contacted Hardip Singh P. W. and both of them opened the shop. On physical checking, the following stock of insecticides was found in the stock:

I. 36 boxes each containing 20 containers of one litre each of Tok-E-40.

II. 205 boxes each containing four containers of 5 litres of Tok-E-40.

Seizure memos were prepared which were signed by Hardip Singh and said Jagmohan Singh.

2. Thereupon, the Insecticides Inspector filed complaint against the accused in the Court of Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Zira, on the ground that the accused had no licence and that the Government had banned the sal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top