SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

(SHORT NOTE)
PATNA HIGH COURT
M. M. Prasad, J.
Bijoy Kumar Mandai and others -Petitioners
versus
State of Bihar -Opp. Party
Criminal Revision No. 58 of 1977(R)
Decided on 2-12-1982
S.K. Chattopadhyaya and Gopal Chowdhury, Advocates-For the Petitioners.
M.S. Chabra, Advocate-For the State.

IMPORTANT POINT
Cognizance of all offence under section 188 of Indian Penal Code cannot be taken on report of a Choukidar who is not a public officer.
Revision Petition allowed.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Sections 144 and 195(1)-Indian Penal Code 1860, Section 188-Petitioner charged under section 188 of Indian Penal Code for violation of prohibition order issued under section 144 Criminal Procedure Code-Cognizance of offence taken on Report of Chaukidar-Whether correct? (No)

       

Bijoy Kumar Mandals VS State of Bihar
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top