SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

O.P.SAXENA
A. S. Sanyal and two others – Appellant
Versus
Khem Chand – Respondent


JUDGMENT

O. P. Saxena, J. - This is a criminal revision and connected criminal miscellaneous application under section 48l, Criminal Procedure Code against the order dated 12-1-1983 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Pithoragarh is Criminal Revision No. 18 of 1982, A. S. Nayal and two others v. State and another.

2. The facts giving rise to this revision and connected criminal miscellaneous application are that Khem Chand is employed as a driver in the Collectorate in district Pithoragarh. A. S. Nayal, Kunal Sharma and Sabhajit Shukla are Executive Magistrates posted in district Pithoragarh. On 19-10-1981 Khem Chand filed a complaint against A. S. Nayal and two other Executive Magistrates for offences under sections 323, 394, 504 and 506 Indian Penal Code said to have been committed on 10-9-1981 at 8.15 P.M. It was alleged that the accused abused, threatened and beat the complainant and robbed him of Rs. 3,000/ on account of a suspicion that he had earlier made a complaint against them to the District Magistrate. She statement of Khem Chand was recorded under section 200, Criminal Procedure Code on the same days. P.W. 1 Murli Dhar, P.W. 2 Lalta Prasad and P.W. 3 Govind Chandra w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top