SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.S.DEWAN
Balraj Singh – Appellant
Versus
Balkar Singh – Respondent


JUDGMENT

S.S. Dewan, J. - A short question under section 127 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, the Code) is raised in this petition under section 482 of the Code. The question is, whether an order of cancellation of the maintenance allowance can be made to take effect from the date of the application for cancellation or instead from the date of the order?

2. The material facts of the case are within a short compass and may be briefly set out. Balkar Singh respondent is the son of Balraj Singh petitioner. He was allowed maintenance allowance under section 488 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898 in the year 1961. The amount of maintenance was enhanced to Rs. 100/- subsequently with effect from 14.11.1969 vide order dated 10.2.1977. The revision petition filed by Balraj Singh petitioner was dismissed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bamala, on 16.12.1977. The petitioner then filed an application under section 127 of the Code seeking cancellation of the maintenance order in favour of the respondent on the ground that the latter had become major. That application was however, allowed by the Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bamala, on 22.12.1981 and it was di

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top