H.L.ANAND
Vijay Khanna – Appellant
Versus
Jumbo Electronics Co. Ltd. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
H. L. Anand, J.- By this petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal sport Officer concerned informing the said officer that the presence of the petitioner was required in the Court in connection with the case.
2. According to the complaint, a copy of which is enclosed as Annexure-I to the petition Jumbo Electronics Co. Ltd., the respondent, carries on business in London in Video Cassettes and other electronics goods, and Pranab Kumar Banerjee, through whom the complaint is filed, as the company's representative at New Delhi, who functions under a senior officer of the company, Vinod Bajaj, from A-464, Defence Colony, in New Delhi. The Company has a telephone No. 611404 at the said premises. It is alleged that various communications between the company and the petitioner took place "from A-464, Defence Colony,- New Delhi." It is alleged that in the last week of August, 1982, petitioner-accused got in touch with Vinod Bajaj on telephone from London at the above number and told him that he was "Managing Director of Cammtex Ltd." and wanted to purchase from the respondent a large quantity of blank video cassettes worth £ 100,000 against two post dated cheques of £ 50,0
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.