SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.P.MATHUR
Birendra Singhs – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
R. P. Singh, Advocate-For the Revisionists.
A.G.A.-For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

V. P. Mathur, J.-The abovenamed revisionists were granted bail in a case under Sections 147, 148 and 302/149 of the Indian Penal Code by Mr. V.K. Jain, Chief Judicial Magistrate of Fatehpur on 12-7-1984. An application for cancellation of bail was moved before the Sessions Judge of Fatehpur by the State and the learned Sessions Judge, vide, his order dated 31-7-1984 cancelled the bail granted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate and took the five applicants into custody after canceling their bail bonds and surety-deeds. Against this order of the learned Sessions Judge, the present revision has been filed.

2. To understand the matter better, facts of the case have to be shortly mentioned. One Sri Pannalal Gupta of Bindki town was allegedly murdered on 24-6'1.984 at about 10 in the night. The report was lodged in the Police Station at Bandki at 4.30 A.M. Eight persons were named as assailants. They include the present five revisionists, and one Sri Madan Singh, Station Officer, Bindki and one Sri Goreylal who is alleged to have fired the fatal shot with a gun. It was a case of spot death and the first informant Sri Kailash Nath Gupta a close relative of the deceased was allegedl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top