SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

N.N.SHARMA
Rameshwar Prasad – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sr. Manoj Prasad, Advocate-For the Applicant
H.P. Tripathi A.G.A., Advocate-For the Opp. Party

JUDGMENT

N.N. Sharma, J. This revision is directed against order dated' 25.11.1981 By Sri J.P. Singh, learned IV Additional Sessions Judge, Varanasi in Criminal Appeal No. 265 of 1981 by which conviction of revisionist under Section 325, 323, 504, 506 read with Section 34 of Indian Pe;1al Code were affirmed. The sentences of one year's rigorous imprisonment under section 325 IPC, six months' rigorous imprisonment under Section 323 IPC, one month's rigorous imprisonment under Section 504 IPC and two months' rigorous imprisonment under Section 506 IPC were also affirmed.

2. The aforesaid conviction and sentences were recorded by Sri A.K. Dubey, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Varanasi in Criminal Case No. 438 of 1979 on 26.6.1981.

3. Briefly stated the prosecution version was that Ramesh Prasad Srivastava complainant (P. W.1) and the revisionist who "are cousins, resided. in house no. 60/62, Karn Ghanta, Varanasi. while revisionist was aged about 12 years only. His parents expired and he was brought-up by the father of complainant and educated and married by him. It was further asserted that complainant asked him to reside in a separate house along with his wife which he refus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top