SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.D.JAIN
Kanwar Pal Bishnoi – Appellant
Versus
Addl. Sessions Judgs & 2 others – Respondent


Mr. R.D. Upadhyay with Mr. Munshi Tyagi, Advocates-For the Petitioner.
Mr. K.K. Sud, Advocate-For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

J.D. Jain, J.-The controversy in this petition under Article 221 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (for short 'the Code') which is directed against order dated 5th December 1983 of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Punjabi Bagh, lifting the attachment made under Section 146(1) of the Code and dropping the proceeding under Section 145 of the Code and subsequent order dated 11th June 1984 of an Addl. Sessions Judge passed in revision petition filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid order of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate lies in a narrow compass although it has a chequered history of litigation.

2. The dispute between the parties relates to plot No. P-6, Uttam Nagar, measuring 200 sq. yards (for short 'the plot in question') which was admittedly owned by M/s. Supreme Land & House Building Society (for short 'the Society') of which Shri Bakshish Chand Sharma i was the treasurer. The petitioner is a milk vendor. He started his dairy business sometime in 1973. His contention is that he took ( the plot in question on rent from Shri Bakshlsh Chand Sharma in his capacity as treasurer of the Society in March 1918 at Rs. 40/- per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top