SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SURINDER SINGH
Jai Parkash – Appellant
Versus
State of Haryana – Respondent


Advocates:
D.S. Walia, Advocate-For the Petitioner.
Jatinder Sharma, Advocate-For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

Surinder Singh, J.-Jai Parkash son of Phool Singh resident of Village Bakana, District Kurukshetra, was convicted and sentenced by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Kurukshetra, as follows:

(a) under section 385, Indian Penal Code, to two years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for six months;

(b) under section 387, Indian Penal Code, three years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for nine months.

Both the substantive sentences of imprisonment were ordered to run concurrently.

The appeal filed by the petitioner against the aforesaid conviction and sentence was dismissed by the Additional Sessions Judge(1), Kurukshetra. Hence, the present Revision Petition by him.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that on September 17, 1980, an application (Exhibit PC) was filed by Bal Kishan (P.W. 4) before Sub-Inspector Shadi Lal, Station House Officer of Police Station Radnur, in which it was stated that on the evening of August 30, 1980, he had received a threatening letter in Hindi to the effect that if he wante

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top