SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

G.R.LUTHRA
Anant Ram Nanda – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Mr. O. P. Soni with Ms. Kamlesh Dutt, Advocates - For the Petitioner.
Sodhi Teja Singh, Advocate - For the State.
Mr. D. C. Mathur with Mr. S. C. Tamsta, Advocates - For the Respondent No. 2.

JUDGMENT

G.R. Luthra, J.-The present petition under section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the Code) is for quashing a preliminary order under section 145 and an order attaching, under section 146 of the Code, a property No. 5229-31, Sarai Hafiz Banna, Gandhi Market, Sadar Bazar, Delhi. These orders were passed on 9th August 1985 by Shri G S. Chaturvedi, SDM, Kotwali, Delhi.

2. The impugned orders were passed on an application dated 8th August 1985 of one Rakesh Nanda, who claims to be in possession of the property in question as a tenant of the petitioner. It was alleged in that application that there was dispute about the possession of the aforesaid property on account of which there was possibility of breach of peace and, therefore, the proceedings under sections 145 and 146 of the Code be taken. Vide order under section 145 of the Code, the learned S.D.M. called upon the parties i.e. the present petitioner and Rakesh Nanda to appear before him on September 3, 1985 and to put in their respective written submissions, documents and list of witnesses, if any, in support of their respective claims regarding the possession of the property in dispute

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top