SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.D.JAIN
A. M. Chakraborty – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Ved Vrat – Respondent


Mr. M.L. Bhargava and D.R. Sethi,
Advocates - For the Petitioner.
Mr. R.K. Mehta, Advocate - For the Respondent.

JUDGMENT

J.D. Jain, J. - Both the above mentioned revision petitions are directed against order dated 2nd February, 1983 of an Additional Sessions Judge discharging the respondents in a police case under Sections 193, 448, 403, 464, 465 & 471 read with Section 120-B, Indian Penal Code (for short 'IPC').

2. The facts leading to these revision petitions in brief are that Miss Kamla Sen Gupta was the owner of property bearing No. A-5, Chitranjan Park, New Delhi. Dr. Ved Vrat-respondent No. 1 was her tenant in respect of the ground floor of the said property. Miss Kamla Sen Gupta died interstate on 18th December, 1977 leaving behind her brother Arun Kumar Sen Gupta, who was a lunatic and has since died, and four sisters, namely, Smt. Bina Gupta, Smt. Kalyani Sen, Smt. Lalita Ray and Smt. Bani Roy. None of the legal heirs of the deceased was living with her at the time of her death and they were all residing in Calcutta excepting Smt. Bani Roy, who was then living in North Caro­lina, U.S.A.

3. On 19th February, 1980, the petitioner ­A.M. Chakraborty who was holding a power of attorney from all the above-mentioned heirs of the deceased, lodged a complaint at Police Station Kalkaji that i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top