SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

B.L.YADAV, K.N.SINGH
Ram Kripal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Sri Siddharath Shukla, Advocate -For the Petitioner.
D.G.A. -For the Respondents.

JUDGMENT

B.L. Yadava, J. - By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution the petitioner has challenged the order of detention dated 15-2-1985 passed under section 3(2) of the National Security Act, 1980 (for short the Act) by the District Magistrate, Deoria. The impugned order has been passed on the basis of the grounds that the District Magistrate was satisfied that with a view to prevent the petitioner from acting in any manner prejudicial to the maintenance of the public order the detention of the petitioner was inevitable.

2. The grounds of detention as required by section 8 of the Act were communicated to the petitioner. Those grounds translated in English read as follows: -

(i)      On 3-4-1983 at 10 a.m. in Kachchli Hatta Crossing of Barhaj Bazar you along with your friends killed Rudra Pratap Singh @ Attal. As a result thereof the persons in the market ran away and the market remained closed for a number of days. Crime No. 91/83 under Sections 147/148/149/302 I.P.C. was registered and the charge-sheet was submitted to the Court on 6-7-1983. The case is still under consideration. You have threatened the witnesses of the case and they are not daring to come to depose

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top